The Weiler Psi

Parapsychology Journalism: The People, The Theory, The Science, The Skeptics

The Logic of Psychically Based Rational Thought


The title is a mouthful, but actually this topic is fairly straightforward.  What is the thinking of psychic people like?  To the skeptic and logically minded people, we seem to be flaky and illogical, without direction or purpose or long term planning.  To a certain extent, they have a point, but something deeper is at play here and that is the purpose of this article.

This is a question I’ve been mulling around recently as it is sometimes hard to put something that you kind of have a sense about into words.  I’ve been around psychic people most of my life and I’ve also studied some anthropology and linguistics in college.  One of the things that I learned was that every system of speech and every method of living and the rational thought process that groups of people have established comes with has an internal logic and a set of rules that work extremely well within the system.  Psychic people are no exception to this.

It starts with the realization that psychic people make their important decisions based on their feelings rather than using logic, information and rational thought.  This might seem batshit crazy to skeptics and left brained people in general, but it isn’t.

This process is actually codified into language with such terms as “go with your gut” and “it feels right.”  These are familiar terms to just about anybody, but they ring particularly true for psychic people.  The reason for this is quite simple:  it works better than any other process a psychic person has available to them.  This kind of thinking is the product of a sort of subconscious training process involving having a feeling about something important, making a decision based on it and then evaluating the outcome.  Far more often than not, the psychic person will be presented with evidence that a feeling based approach yielded better results.  Over time it becomes obvious that this method of evaluating the best course of action is superior to thinking things out.

Of course, most psychic people will do the sensible thing and blend the two methods, using whichever is the most appropriate at the moment, but it’s useful to note just how useful a feeling based approach can be.  Psychic people in general can usually give several examples off the top of their heads.

In the area of romance, a feeling based approach to the selection of a mate is often the only one available.  It is simply impossible to consider all the variables and most people know this, with even the most logical of people having to succumb to the superiority of their feelings over their rational thought in this matter.

My personal example is perhaps a good one.  When I met my wife Carmel, she was a bit overweight, an angry person, often disagreeable, easily upset and to being very bossy.  By any sane logic I should have moved on to find someone with fewer problems.  But my feelings told me the exact opposite and this is what guided me.  I never really stopped to think about it, I just went forward and rushed into marriage.  It turned out to be a really good thing.

What I could not have figured out at the time was Carmel’s capacity for change, which turned out to be quite the significant factor.  She had food allergies, which she immediately got under control with my help and her weight dropped to more normal levels.  She also calmed down because she was being supported in a positive way for the first time and during the inevitable clashes that we had during our first years of marriage, she turned out to have good character and the ability to admit she was wrong and change her behavior when necessary.  Another important factor was that I had found a woman that was quite as devoted to me as I was to her; I hadn’t considered that at all.

In short, there was no logical way to assess the situation, but using a feeling based approach yielded not just satisfactory, but superb results.

I can’ emphasize this enough.  What seems from the outside to be a rather strange way to run one’s life, is in actually a group of people merely playing to their own strengths.  A feeling based approach to rational thought can be quite successful if one is a feeling based person to start with.

Using a feeling based approach requires a certain outlook on life that is definitely foreign to skeptics.  Psychic people tend towards believing things until proven wrong, rather than disbelieving things until proven right.  This method avoids the negative mindset that might interfere with the successful feeling based approach to rational thinking.  Instead of closing off opportunity to avoid being wrong, the psychic person opens up opportunity on the chance some of it might be true.  While to the left brain person this might make a person gullible and susceptible to charlatans and looney beliefs, they are only partly right.  This system of thinking has its own set of logic.

Normally, our opinions carry no weight except in our heads and the only penalty for being wrong is merely a bit of humiliation of the ego.  If a person can withstand that, and a psychic person usually can, then the penalty for being wrong is quite minimal.  It is also much easier to discover the truth about something when you embrace it fully, so a psychic person will gain more first hand knowledge of more things faster than a logical, left brained skeptical person as a general rule.  The spirit of questioning conventional beliefs and exploring unusual things is a powerful learning tool that psychic people tend to take advantage of.

A feeling based approach generally requires a more trusting outlook on life.  One of the advantages of this approach is that psychic people are more likely to learn from the advice of others and also from their mistakes and use that information to their advantage.  A more skeptical approach to life generally involves having to make one’s own mistakes, which can be quite costly in terms of time and effort over the course of years.

That psychic people should develop a pattern of thinking that plays to their strengths while minimizing their weaknesses should be a surprise to no one.  What I do find incredible is that I have never run across this type of assessment before.  It’s not as if I’m privy to some sort of exclusive information, I’m just putting together the obvious pieces.  If there is any fault here to be had, it is in those who choose to ignore the basic fact that people are different in ways that are sometimes difficult to understand.

Advertisements

9 comments on “The Logic of Psychically Based Rational Thought

  1. Pingback: Logic, Illogic, Trolls, & Alien Modes of Reasoning « The Call of Troythulu

  2. Rachel
    November 23, 2011

    Hi,

    I’m from England and am mostly ignored because I don’t share your mentality, but this is my one last try on this site to discuss the modern obsession with belief. I don’t dislike belief because I need things to be proven, I dislike it because people (psychics and agnostics alike), unthinkingly assume that belief is the prime cause of all phenomena; I know from experience that it isn’t.

    • craigweiler
      November 23, 2011

      Hi Rachel,
      This is actually a pretty difficult topic because it involves perception and defining what belief is, which is more difficult than it appears.

      What makes this so challenging is that it is hard to define what reality is. Is it actual physical stuff? In that case, everything, including our bodies is almost entirely empty space. Is it energy? Which energy?

      Then there is the problem of how we perceive reality. We can only do so with our consciousness. We only perceive reality with our minds. Our five (or six) senses only provide sensory input. We don’t experience anything until our consciousness has interpreted that input.

      We have no way of experiencing anything without doing this. Which begs the question: If an apple is only a construct of our mind, an interpretation of incoming data, how much of this is belief? No one can know the answer because there is no such thing as experience without consciousness.

  3. insomniac
    November 21, 2011

    Howdy Craig,
    As always a good practical look at the subject. Just like everything else, our brain grows to accommodate how it is used… most especially during childhood development. When we were kids is when we started to trust our internal sources for information and grow some neurons that worked that way. I think alot of it can be understood with the split brain concept as a starting point. The areas of the brain that light up for us don’t get much juice for folks who have never used those circuits. Use it or lose it. =-)

    • craigweiler
      November 21, 2011

      I agree. I would only add that I think that we are wired this way to start with, so we have a beginning point of being very sensitive.

  4. Don Salmon
    November 20, 2011

    very nice column, as usual, Craig. I’ve just come off a round of talking with skeptics about psychic phenomena, over the past 2 or 3 months – and also talking about there being some kind of Consciousness underlying the process of evolution.

    My experience again and again has been that it feels like we’re talking not just different languages but in parallel universes. Very strange. Anybody who wants to check it out can look at the “Integral world Forum”, where some very strange and disjointed conversations have taken place. I’ve tried to enter into their way of seeing things… well, you be the judge.

    By the way, I hope your financial situation has gotten better. The first thing I thought of when reading today’s column is how much more in recent years I’ve trusted my “gut” – my intuition, and how when i really do so, the outer situation almost inevitably becomes more harmonious.

    This could lead the way to an interesting conversation regarding discernment – knowing what “level” (if you forgive the perhaps overly rational word) of gut or intuition one is discerning. It is possible to follow one’s desires and think one is following some kind of higher intuition. Very interesting process of discriminating between the two.

    best,
    don

    • craigweiler
      November 20, 2011

      Thank you once again, Don. Things have stabilized financially, but it’s still not great. I did get a column accepted for the Huffington Post, but I’ve waited for over two weeks for them to get back to me on the details. I hope to find a way to get some income coming in from publishing eventually. That’s the plan.

      I’m reading a very good book you might be interested in that deals with skeptics. Randi’s Prize. I can’t remember the authors name and it’s not handy because I have to do internet stuff from my bedroom right now in order to piggyback on neighbor’s wireless. This will soon be settled, but in the meantime it’s a royal pain.

  5. Monica
    November 20, 2011

    THANK you. You have no idea how much people give me crap for ‘not being rational’. Sorry, but your ‘rationality’ completely ignores your emotions, which is *half of your thought process*. Oy, you’d think they’d learn…

    • craigweiler
      November 20, 2011

      As always, I’m glad to help. I have a feeling that this will be helpful to more people than just you Monica.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: