The Weiler Psi

Parapsychology Journalism: The People, The Theory, The Science, The Skeptics

There is Something Amazing about Intuition


I spend time occasionally on a forum hosted by the Skeptico Podcast where host Alex Tsakiris takes on materialists and exposes flaws in their arguments.  Sometimes I get ideas for blog posts, and that was the case today.  The idea came when I was in a discussion with a skeptic who was repeating the skeptical mantra that intuition is is just a form of guessing and calculating odds.  Now I’ve been hearing that drivel for my entire adult life and up until now I just brushed it off and moved on. But this time was different.  Rather than argue with someone who has their mind made up, I stopped for a moment and pondered the question What is intuition?   It turns out, this is a very good question.  There is something quite special about intuition.

Intuition has long been linked to psychic ability; after all, many psychics call themselves intuitives in an attempt to more closely describe what they do.  But it can also be described as a hunch, which is not thought to be paranormal in origin.  The subconscious supposedly gathers tremendous amounts of information in an instant and makes lightening fast judgment calls which are nearly always corrext.

Michael Shermer sums up the skeptical position best with this statement in a book review of Malcom Gladwell’s book “Blink.”

We are collecting data about a person or situation, and that data is being analyzed somewhere in the brain. How precisely that is being done remains a mystery.  (…) We are especially good at snap judgments when it comes to human relations, because we evolved as a social primate species living in small tribes in which social relations were extremely important. We needed (and still need) to know whom we can trust and whom we cannot trust; in the prehistoric world of our Paleolithic environment we had only our wits and intuitions, the “sense” or “feeling” we had for someone’s trustworthiness, to rely on. The social calculus was not the slow and systematic logic of analysis; it was (and is) the subtle and fast feeling of a felt emotion. That “feeling” is the expression of an internal computation whose consequences are important.

The materialist version of intuition sees our brains as supercomputers which take in crucial information in just a few short seconds and process it into appropriate responses.  it is seen as a super fast logical process.  Here is a perfect example of how this is explained:

Hodgkinson cites the recorded case of a Formula One driver who braked sharply when nearing a hairpin bend without knowing why he was doing so. As a result, the driver avoided hitting a pile-up of cars on the track ahead, which undoubtedly saved his life.

“The driver couldn’t explain why he felt he should stop, but the urge was much stronger than his desire to win the race,” explains Professor Hodgkinson. “The driver underwent forensic analysis by psychologists afterwards, where he was shown a video to mentally relive the event. In hindsight he realized that the crowd, which would have normally been cheering him on, wasn’t looking at him coming up to the bend but was looking the other way in a static, frozen way. That was the cue. He didn’t consciously process this, but he knew something was wrong and stopped in time.”

The literature is full of examples of this kind.  What researchers have found, which the rest of us knew all along, is that intuition is something special.  Very special.  A University College London (UCL) experiment involved subjects picking a rotated object out of a group of 650 objects.

Intriguingly, the researchers found that participants scored better if they were given no scrutinizing time at all. With only a tiny fraction of a second for scrutinizing the target, subjects performed with 95 percent accuracy. With over a second to scrutinize the image, subjects were only 70 percent accurate. Accuracy was recovered if scrutinizing was allowed to run for more than 4 seconds.

The research is pretty consistent in its findings.  Simple decisions benefit from a logical process, but the more complicated the decision, the greater the benefit from an intuitive decision.  For those that read this blog, this probably makes perfect sense; it certainly does to me.  But to the rest of the world, it appears to be totally counter intuitive.

The question eventually arises here:  what does psi have to do with this?  The answer lies in understanding intuitive people and their thought process, I think.  No one denies the helpfulness of knowledge in decision making and certainly people who have expertise do better with intuition in their specialty than people who know nothing.  It comes back to the total readout theory I discussed a couple of years ago.  (here’s the link, but I see now that it has a few inaccuracies.)  Psychic ability blends seamlessly with the other senses to create an information stream which bypasses normal logical processing to provide extremely quick answers to complex problems.

Probably the most common of these abilities is face reading.  Because of their emotional sensitivities, many psychic people learned from a very early age to read faces for subtle clues because it was important to know what parents and authority figures were thinking and feeling.  Highly sensitive people are generally very, very good at this.  The facial clues though, can be too subtle for most people to notice, but with psychic ability comes the additional input of knowing the other person’s emotional state in that moment.  A sudden tightness or a flash of anger will be felt as the subtle facial expressions are observed.  Therefore, sensitive people are able to equate these minute and extremely quick changes in facial expression to actual emotion and learn face reading much more thoroughly. There is far more to the observation than what a researcher might test for.

In Malcolm Gladwell’s book Blink, he uses the phrase “thin slicing” to describe the way we use intuition.  Although Gladwell steers well clear of the realm of psychic ability, there is ample evidence that this is what is happening.  In studies of telepathy the brain shows significant activation involving the right parahippocampal gyrus and in studies of intuition, the activity is over a broader area on the right side of the brain including the right parahipocampal gyrus.  It makes sense.  There are few survival traits of the mind more important than intuition, so it makes sense that this area would use considerable brain power.

To sum this up, intuition is a thing.  The more it is studied, the more amazing it becomes.  Our ability to make goal oriented decisions lightening fast has been observed and documented scientifically.  So remember: don’t think too hard or too long about your next difficult decision.  You already know the answer.

 

Advertisements

7 comments on “There is Something Amazing about Intuition

  1. Hope Wills
    July 23, 2012

    Hello, I have always gotten feelings from looking at peoples teeth. I have tried to research this,no luck. Its not a matter of the teeth being healthy or not. I get a feeling that this is a good person or I need to stay away from this person and whatever i feel ends up panning out. What the hell is this?

    • craigweiler
      July 23, 2012

      Psychic ability can involve a blending of the senses. I’ve never heard of people using teeth as a method of character assessment, but it’s really just a form of synthesia. In other words it’s a blending of psychic ability and visual information. My feeling is that this is probably a fairly common occurrence for psychic people.

  2. Michael Bourne
    April 24, 2012

    Over the past few months you may have noticed that I have shown an interest in some of the articles you have written. I have used Scoop.it to allow my audience the opportunity to be aware of them and enjoy the quality of your work. I have recently taken over as Editor for Mindscape Magazine and it is my intention to make the new quarterly edition full of great articles, very much like the ones I have scooped of yours

    Mindscape will be the leading light in bringing information to the public that is often suppressed, or not widely known. In addition to this, it’s aim is also to bring together people who are tired of the misinformation out there and set the record straight.

    Mindscape will now be an e publication and available on all major platforms, Ipad, Android and more. I would like to offer you an invite you to submit any articles you may wish to have published.

    Although you would not be paid it would give you the opportunity to reach a wider audience and become part of the team at Mindscape and a fantastic way for you to build a following of your own.

    If you’ve a book, or a DVD, or are a public speaker, you can mention your work in the bio section of the article.

    Articles ideally should be between 2-4000 words in length, be your own work and any images used must have copyright clearance, or belong to you. Please also include a two paragraph section about yourself, and your a link to your website, or other details. Please make sure all articles are spell checked and your own work.

    Please use the following link to submit your work:

    http://mindscapemagazine.com/contribute-to-mindscape/

    If you’re not a writer, but know of others who would write for us, please forward this to them.

    “Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail”
    Ralph Waldo Emerson

    Michael – Editor of Mindscape Magazine

  3. plerudulier
    April 15, 2012
  4. Dan Booth Cohen, PhD
    April 12, 2012

    Great post, Craig. I was at a session at the Towards a Science of Consciousness Conference this morning where three presenters were have an animated argument about the research on subjects picking a rotating object. They went back and forth calling each other wrong. Unfortunately, I didn’t know what the hell they were arguing about. I’m sure you would have gotten more out of it.

    The reductionist approach to consciousness and brain science exhausts me. It can tell us a little bit about what we don’t understand and even less about how to solve real world problems on the personal, family, community, national and world level. Say those three agreed about subjects picking a rotating object. Whose anxiety would be eased? Whose marriage would improve? How would our children be healthier and more secure?

    I worked a few weeks ago with a English woman who contacted me because she was stuck in a paralyzing despondency that had been ongoing for 3 years. She felt hopeless and lost in her life, even though she had a good husband, home, and family. In a Constellation, I stood as a representative for her grandfather. Inexplicably, I smelled burning flesh. I asked her, “Did your grandfather see combat in the war?” She responded, “Yes, but more importantly, when he was 10 years old, his father set the covers on fire while smoking in bed. He was severely burned and died 3 days later. A week after the Constellation, she wrote me that that dark feelings were evaporating.

    Do we really need to subject these occurrences to reductionist experiments? I have never had an olfactory hallucination before and may never again. I have a hard time ascribing this to coincidence or intuition especially since I have countless examples of psi perception.

    While the best scientific minds continue to be obsessed with arguing with Descartes and Creationists, 30% of incoming female college freshman arrive on campus with a prescription for a psychiatric medication. The main beneficiaries of the materialist view of consciousness are the pharmaceutical companies and their marketing and sales experts, MDs and PhDs.

    • craigweiler
      April 14, 2012

      Thanks Dan. It’s interesting isn’t it? The reductionist approach allows people to control for the details, but they don’t accomplish anything noteworthy. Sometimes the solutions are so simple. I have a stack of emails and comments from people who report that their lives have improved solely on the basis of reading the information that I have provided. My message is that they are not crazy and I back it up with research and clear, honest insights and this is apparently enough to help them. It’s all about providing the right sort of help and you can’t do that without real insight, such as your example.

  5. pinkrangerv
    April 12, 2012

    I think we need to start thinking about the difference between psychic, the medical\physical differences, and psychic, the culture. Science is understanding the medical perfectly well–but the reason they keep claiming findings like these ‘debunk’ psychics is because they have a problem with psychic culture, which relies on nonscientific explanations due to the original lack of science\familial traditions\community-oriented views we have. We can research psychic abilities anytime, but when we do, what are we going to do about our culture?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on April 12, 2012 by in Alternative Science, parapsychology, Psychic's Psychology and tagged , .
%d bloggers like this: